Relevancy Analytics relevancyanalytics.com

Incrementality test sizer

Before you hold out a slice of your audience to prove a channel works, check whether the test can see the answer. Put in what you convert in a week, the share you'd hold out, and the lift you'd need to see. It tells you how long the test takes, what the holdout costs, and when a holdout is the wrong tool.

Your numbers

Bookings, orders, leads. Whatever the channel is meant to cause, counted the same way in both groups.
The random share of people who won't see the channel while the test runs.
The smallest effect that would change a budget decision. If a 3% lift wouldn't move money, don't size the test to find it.
Turns the holdout's cost into money. Any currency.

Measurable in a quarter.

6
weeks the test needs
1,091
conversions in the holdout by the end
109
conversions the holdout forgoes
6.5%
smallest lift you could see in 12 weeks

Weeks by holdout share

HoldoutWeeks

Smallest lift by test length

LengthLift

What this assumes

When this isn't your test

If the weeks run past a quarter, a bigger holdout or a bigger target lift are the only two levers here, and both have a price. Past that, change the method. A geo-lift test pools whole regions and borrows strength from the ones you don't touch. Marketing mix modelling reads the lift out of the history you already have, with wider error bars and no holdout at all. Matching the method to the size of the channel is most of the job.

Built by Charlie Ballard, Relevancy Analytics. A sizing estimate, not a test design.